Category Archives: History

Gladnytt fra 1975: Endelig fred i Kambodsja

Det hendte 75 - Fred i Kambodsja etter 25 år

Kambodsja gjennomgikk 25 års fødselsveer

Det gamle kongeriket Kambodsja fikk gjennomgå 25 års fødselsveer før den egentlige oppbyggingen av landet i det hele tatt kunne påbegynnes.

1949. Kongedømmet Kambodsja ble en selvstendig stat innenfor den franske unionen.

1953. De pågående kampene mellom franskmenn og vietnamesere spredte seg inn i Kambodsja. Kambodsjansk gerilja begynte å delta i frigjøringskrigen mot franskmennene.

1954. Genève-konferansen satte stopp for krigen i Indo-Kina. Kampene avtok og franskmennene trakk seg tilbake.

1955. Kambodsja ble helt selvstendig. Kong Norodom Sihanouk frasa seg tittelen, men beholdt posten som statssjef. [..]

1969. General Lon Nol ble utnevnt til statsminister med vidtgående fullmakter.

1970. Fyrst Sihanouk ble styrtet ved et militærkupp ledet av Lon Nol. Statsministeren proklamerte republikk og utnevnte seg selv til marskalk. Sihanouk flyktet til Peking. USAs daværende president Richard Nixon tillot amerikanske og sør-vietnamesiske styrker å invadere Kambodsja i sin kamp mot FNL. I Peking dannet Sihanouk eksilregjeringen GRUNK.

1971. Den nasjonal frigjøringsfronten FUNK hadde stor fremgang og kontrollerte snart den største delen av landet.

1973. USAs mest intense bombing av Indo-Kina ble innledet mot FUNK-geriljaen. I august ble bombingen stanset av den amerikanske kongressen. I Kambodsja proklamerte Lon Nol unntakstilstand.

1974. FUNK rykket inn i den tidligere kambodsjanske hovedstaden Gudong. Byen ble imidlertid gjenerobret av regjeringsstyrkene, men da geriljaen innledet en kraftig offensiv ved årsskiftet, ble Lon Nol-regjeringen tvunget til å overgi den ene viktige stillingen etter den andre. USAs president Gerald Ford krevde ytterligere bevilgninger til Lon Nol-regimet, men fikk avslag av kongressen.  Dermed var også geriljaens seier et faktum.

- Det hendte 75

Scott Eyman – Lion of Hollywood – The Life and Legend of Louis B. Mayer

Louis B. Mayer (1884 – 1957) was another of the Eastern European Jews who created Hollywood.  He headed Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer from 1924 to 1951, the period when it was the most powerful, glamorous and wholesome of the big Hollywood studios.  Every studio had their niche.  MGM’s was to be more respectable, more polished, and have higher budgets that anyone else.  Some studios allowed individuals to take creative chances.  MGM was a machine, where talent was a necessary component, but subservient to the process.

For almost three decades, talent didn’t care.  Neither did audiences.  MGM made some great movies, like A Night at the Opera (1935), The Wizard of Oz (1939), and Singin’ in the Rain (1952), but Hollywood in the Golden Age was not primarily about creating great movies, not in the sense movie nerds think of them.  They were presenting a vision that appealed to audiences at the time – and in some cases still does.  That vision was summed up in Mayer’s habit of always looking for ways to improve his movies by spending more money on them.  Money and polish, not brilliant directors, made Hollywood great.

Mayer’s MGM favorites were the Andy Hardy movies, a series of B movies about a small-town family that can be compared to today’s family-friendly TV dramas.  Mayer didn’t need the Production Code to keep his movies decent.  He was a zealous convert to middle-class wholesomeness, to art as something that should provide moral and esthetic elevation.  This eventually went out of fashion, and Mayer left the scene along with it.

Lecture roundup

Here are some good lectures and speeches to watch on a Sunday morning, (or a Monday afternoon, or really any time).  I’ve posted most on these links on Twitter over the last couple months, and here they all are again, because this really is worth watching.

Niall Ferguson, who like all people with strong views about the big picture should be listened to with fascinated skepticism, talks about how empires fall, and about taking an evolutionary approach to finance history.

Frank Gavin is more grounded to earth when he talks about how to take the right lessons from history.

In Swedish, Hans Rosling explains that the taxonomy of industrial vs developing countries is 50 years out of date.

P.J. O’Rourke talks about his new book Don’t Vote.

Norman Doidge explains how neuroplasticity means your brain never stops changing.

Neal Stephenson talks about what science fiction is, and how it’s connected with mainstream culture.

Not having read anything by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, I must say she’s less fanatical than her reputation.

In Norwegian, Asle Toje talks about the Norwegian culture war.

Not a lecture, but an experimental documentary from my favorite documentarist: Adam Curtis presents an unnarrated view of the year 1970.

For your next two months of commuting, here’s Robert Shiller’s course on financial markets, and John Merriman’s on France Since 1871.

And, of course, Milton Freedman’s 1980 documentary series Free to Choose, which I wrote about recently.

Suggestion: Watch these videos instead of the news every other day or so.  You won’t miss anything.

The fall of the (yup, evil) Soviet Empire (in 256 words)

Victor Sebestyen - Revolution 1989: The Fall of the Soviet Empire

European communism was already bankrupt when the 1980’s began.  It was morally bankrupt, because everyone knew that something was horribly wrong, that even in “actually existing socialism” there wasn’t supposed to be all this corruption and poverty and lying.  And it was financially bankrupt, because the Soviet satellite states were dependent on subsidies from Moscow and loans from Western banks.

Their leaders were fools, and Gorbachev was the greatest fool of them all: He thought he could make communism work. That, if given a choice, the people would choose a more honest, idealistic form of communism.  He gave them that choice, and they made the wrong choice.

There was nothing new about the unrest that led to the final collapse.  Eastern Europeans had tried to get rid of the communists from the very beginning.  1953. 1956. 1968. What was new was that Gorbachev made a conscious decision not to interfere. Without outside force, the communists were too weak to survive.

I don’t believe the fall of European communism was inevitable.  Communism didn’t work and it couldn’t work, in either the totalitarian or the “human face” variant, but it doesn’t work in North Korea either, and Kim Jong-Il is still in power.  The Party had all the guns.  They could have easily massacred the first protesters, as China did.

Perhaps they didn’t want to abandon the last remains of the illusion that they were the people’s vanguard, given power and legitimacy through people’s revolutions. But the only people’s revolutions in Eastern Europe were the ones that finally kicked them out.

The life of Walt Disney (in 256 words)

Neal Gabler - Walt Disney: The Triumph of the American Imagination

From the late 1920′s to the early 1940′s, Walt Disney did something revolutionary every other year or so.  Sound.  Color.  Feature films.  Stereo.  Characters you could empathize with.  People would watch The Skeleton Dance (1929) or Three Little Pigs (1933) and have their minds blown.

Disney’s ambitions were limitless, and for a few short years after Snow White (1937), his studio was the most creative place on earth, or at least in Hollywood.  Pinocchio, Fantasia, Bambi, Dumbo was artistic history.  Disney knew it, viewers knew it, everyone knew it.

Two wars ended the golden age.  One with the Axis powers, which made Disney almost a branch of the government, and another with the unions, whose 1941 strike permanently destroyed the trust and shared sense of mission that made the earlier work possible.  Young Walt was a cult leader, demanding but inspiring.  Old Walt was Uncle Scrooge, an anti-communist who would randomly fire people just to keep everyone on their toes.

Even in the 40′s, Disney did weird and interesting things, such as Victory Through Air Power, but when they returned to real features in 1950, it was not as perfectionists on a holy mission, but as a corporation doing what the public expected of it.

Walt’s attention had shifted elsewhere, to television, and to Disneyland.  Disneyland was not a merchandising opportunity, but a continuation of his vision from the earlier years.  One last holy mission, before he ascended in 1966, and became a secular god – immortal and a little bit frightening.  The god of human emotions, and of an eerily close substitute.

The Algerian War (in 256 words)

Alistair Horne - A Savage War of Peace - Algeria 1954-1962

When the Algerian rebellion started in 1954, Algeria had a population of 1 million Europeans, known as the pied-noirs.  France thought of Algeria as France, and the pied-noirs thought of it as home.  To lose it was inconceivable.

The war started because France refused to grant the Algerians political rights.  Even assimilated Algerians were distrusted by the French, who feared the power of the Muslim hordes.

Algerians formed the FLN, which used a combination of guerilla and terrorist tactics.  Their terrorist activity reached a peak in 1957 with the Battle of Algiers, which resulted in a fantastic movie but was a strategic mistake.

Their failure to defeat the FLN caused the fall of multiple governments, and the French political and military elite turned in despair to Charles de Gaulle, who agreed to take over if he could write a new constitution.  This created the Fifth Republic, which is still in place.

His backers expected de Gaulle to continue the war, but de Gaulle didn’t take orders from anyone.  When he began to hint that France would have to let Algeria go, the army attempted a coup in 1961, which failed. Segments of the army and the pied-noirs formed a terrorist organization of their own, the OAS, whose pointless, brutal terrorist campaign alienated the French public, and made it impossible for the pied-noirs to remain after independence.

The second worst outcome of conflict, after genocide, is mass migration, and this is what happened to the pied-noirs after Algeria became independent in 1962: They all emigrated, mostly to France, where they were assimilated.

Historien om norsk blogging (på 254 ord)

2000-tallet var tiåret da bloggen kom til Norge.  Her er en oppsummering av hvordan det skjedde, før jeg glemmer resten:

Nesten ingen i Norge drev med blogging før 2000.  Det er ikke så rart, for det var dårlig med verktøy.  Mange av de som var tidligst ute skrev nettdagbøker, og forskjellen på det og blog var uklar.

En av de første som brukte bloggen til å skrive om noe, annet enn seg selv, var Jill Walker, som startet i Oktober 2000.  Hun er aktiv fremdeles, og har dermed sannsynligvis Norges lengstlevende blogg.

I 2002 var det fremdeles så få blogger i Norge at jeg kunne vedlikeholde en nesten komplett oversikt. Det var ca 50, og vokste sakte.

Den første politikkbloggeren var nok Fredrik Norman, som startet i Februar 2001.  Han var objektivist, og en del av en høyreorientert trend blandt tidlige politikkbloggere.

Mediene skrev om blogging som fenomen fra ganske tidlig av, men det hele var ganske marginalt. Blogging tok av som mediealternativ i USA rundt 2002-3, og den samme hypen kom til Norge rundt 2005.  Høsten 2005 avholdt norske bloggere en liten blogkonferanse på Skøyen, hvor Tor Andre Wigmostad sa at snart ville blogging være så selvsagt at det ikke ville være spennende å snakke om lenger, akkurat som ingen snakker om papir.

Han fikk rett.  I dag vet jeg ikke hva vi skal med blog-begrepet lenger. Alt på nettet bruker blogteknologi, eller er blogging med et annet navn.  Bloggen er død – og har gjenoppstått som internet.

Og det er vel like greit, for det er nå et fryktelig stygt ord.