Front page
NTB
Threepwood '01 is maintained by Beorn aka Bjørn Stærk,
a norwegian nerd with nothing better to do.
Friendly mail is welcome at Need To Know
|
Saturday, March 17, 2001
Posted 3/17/2001 by Beorn
Posted 3/17/2001 by Beorn
Wow. I already knew what happened at Altamont, but in the history books it's just yet another rock concert tragedy -- seeing it happen is something completely different. The same goes for Mick Jagger, btw. In still photos he's ugly as hell, but on stage he's Rock'n Roll incarnated. I've been a fan of the Stones since I heard Gimme Shelter in the 1993 mini-series Wild Palms, although it actually took me years before I found out which band it was. Posted 3/17/2001 by Beorn
Friday, March 16, 2001
"But your computer! You, uh, you must have developed a combat computer as ... small and rugged as an auto-pilot - I thought miniaturization was our specialty." From Kings who Die, by Poul Anderson, a 1962 short story about cyborgs, neural networks, counsciousness expansion and war as ritual sacrifice. Posted 3/16/2001 by Beorn
Posted 3/16/2001 by Beorn
Until 1989, we hadn't had a single complaint, not even an anonymous one, against a information officer. The [communist] party activists were more afraid of the Securitate than the common people [were]. Only those who had something on their conscience lived in fear of the Securitate. Posted 3/16/2001 by Beorn
In less happy news, I've degraded a few weblogs to inactive status: Noemata, P� vei til Ramaland and X Government Weblog. That reduces the number of active weblogs to 11 -- 7 of which were created this year. The meme is spreading. As always, please let me know of any changes / inaccuracies in the list. What's going on here? Isn't anyone installing security patches anymore? Doesn't anyone care? What's going on is that there are just too damn many patches. It's simply impossible to keep up. Bruce Schneier explains why I keep my fingers away from system administration in his monthly security and cryptography newsletter / weblog CryptoGram. Keeping up to date on relevant exploits and patches for a web server is a full-time job, one which I'm more than happy to leave to my good friend and excellent sysadmin Arcade. This attitude I must admit is kinda like those small european countries that rely on the US marines to rescue them when the russians arrive - (oh, wait, the cold war is over - who is it these days, anyway?) - but we can't all be sysadmins. Somebody have to make all those bugs too. Personally I rely on those two trusted (cough) security concepts Obscurity and Anonymity to protect my Windows home PC. Thursday, March 15, 2001
Posted 3/15/2001 by Beorn
Posted 3/15/2001 by Beorn
The foreign sections, for instance, rarely stoop to actual journalism - they're usually just quoting and summarizing foreign newspapers and press agencies they happen to be reading, (which is why you might want to read these foreign newspapers yourself). Anyone who knows how to write and wield an href can do this. Reprinting articles from AP or NTB is not journalism - this too is primitive blogging. Op-ed and letter pages are not journalism - they're linkless weblogs, or simplified discussion forums if you like. What's left when you remove all this is journalism, the kind where people dig up facts and ask questions, and I respect that as a profession that might actually benefit from specialized education. But on all these other areas, newspapers are going to face som real competition from the numerous news blogs, thematic websites and discussion forums that are popping up all over the web. They're catering to the same audience, and cheap, independent websites have all the technical advantages. Posted 3/15/2001 by Beorn
Posted 3/15/2001 by Beorn
But I think I should clarify a bit here: When I encourage everyone who has something worth saying to write it in english, this isn't some radical call to arms, it's not about forcing or prodding anyone. It's simply acknowledging reality, a reality our cultural protectionists, (see image to the right), are well aware of, but still refuse to accept. The reality here is that to a lot of norwegians, including myself, writing in english comes as natural as writing in norwegian. And this is a good thing, because it finally gives Norway a voice in western culture, which since world war 2 has been dominated by the native english-speaking countries. Norway is pretty small and insignificant, in the larger scheme of things, but occasionally, once in a while, some of us say things that are actually worth listening to. We've been receiving for 50 years, and now it's time to start transmitting. The way I see it, the norwegian language is a part of our cultural heritage, along with bunader, hardingfeler and Asbj�rnsen and Moe - but it's not a vital part of our culture as of 2001. Our heritage deserves to be remembered, but not artificially preserved. It could be argued that if you subtract western culture, protestant culture and scandinavian culture from norwegian culture, there's not much left to set us apart from everyone else - except our language. It could also be argued that subcultures are more important than national cultures these days, (a nerd is a nerd everywhere.) But I'm not concerned with being distinctly norwegian -- I feel more like a netizen of norwegian heritage than an actual norwegian. I am, however, concerned with all those norwegians - and swedes, danes, germans, belgians, french - who have something worth saying, who are encouraged, (even pressured), to use a language that prevents 99.95% of the world from reading their words. By all means, use whatever language you feel comfortable with. There's nothing wrong with choosing to write norwegian, it's the cultural protectionists that are dangerous - and short-sighted. Our culture may not die if we don't start writing english, but it certainly will remain a well-kept secret. Nobody gains from that. Posted 3/15/2001 by Beorn
The first reaction among farmers everywhere when this started was xenophobia - justified, but still xenophobia. A human plague would have the same effect - large scale xenophobia in ever-decreasing circles. First we would close our borders, then we would close our cities, and in the end we would lock up our homes. Civilization is built on trust, and within 24 hours that trust would simply be gone. (Note: This entry was in no way inspired by Verdi's Requiem. It helps for getting in the right mood to write about plauges, though.) Wednesday, March 14, 2001
Posted 3/14/2001 by Beorn
Oh, and for the long version of why norwegians should write english on the web, read my March 5th entry, (or the even longer version at Kuro5hin.) Tuesday, March 13, 2001
Posted 3/13/2001 by Beorn
Posted 3/13/2001 by Beorn
Posted 3/13/2001 by Beorn
Even if international media did a good job covering the conflict, and they don't, an objective and educated analysis from the outside is inferior to the genuine feelings of the people who actually live there. Propaganda is better from the source. Posted 3/13/2001 by Beorn
On the other hand, I'll be looking for a Real Job in programming this fall, so I might want to wait a bit with the champagne. Posted 3/13/2001 by Beorn
Monday, March 12, 2001
There is an old saying that you should not pick an argument with people who buy their ink by the barrel. In the 21st century version, neither should you pick an argument with a mainstream Web site that has more than one million readers a month. Cyber Patrol, the appallingly inaccurate nanny software that does a better job censoring criticism of itself than porn sites, has unblocked tech news-site The Register. They're now only censoring the specific article that mentioned arch-enemy PeaceFire. Linking to Peacefire propably makes my weblog eligible for censorship too -- perhaps I should notify them. Getting censored by Cyber Patrol might be good for my readership numbers, what with all the free speech advocates scrutinizing illegally decrypted blocking lists.
Sunday, March 11, 2001
Posted 3/11/2001 by Beorn
This faith in predictability and rationality makes Foundation a book of optimism and belief in the future - the book of a society that has beaten the nazis and are inventing washing machines. These people are destined for greatness and they know it. Foundation (like many Asimov books) also draws inspiration from the Christie/Doyle-style crime mystery. All the heroes, basically identical, are super-rationalists who deduce simple solutions to complex problems based on seemingly irrelevant clues. The rationalist naivety here is beyond ludicrous, but an idea doesn't have to be true to be beautiful. Foundation is a programmers wet dream. |