Top 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Evolution Bias References
EVIDENCE #3
Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter
resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals, each of these is
an impossibility of science and the natural world.
Life is far too complex to have resulted from any chance happening. Even
the simplest form of life consists of billions of parts working together
and needed for the basic functioning of the organism. These could not have
sprung into being at the same time and interrelating together by chance.
Life coming from matter would violate the law of biogenesis and the cell
principle which state that life must come only from life. Secondly, we find
that the first matter could not simply have come into existence from
nothing. This is a logical absurdity. Finally, we find that morality in
humanity as well as our mental capacity and utter dominance of the physical
world make humanity set apart by any reasonable means from the rest of the
living world.
1. "The simplest organism capable of independent life, the prokargote
bacterial cell, is a masterpiece of miniaturized complexity which
makes a spaceship seem rather low-tech." ([11], p.102)
2. "The cell needs all its basic parts with their various functions, for
survival; therefore, if the cell had evolved, it would have meant that
billions of parts would have had to come into existence at the same
time, in the same place, and then simultaneously come together in a
precise order." ([22], p.15)
3. "...the probability of life originating from accident is comparable to
the unabridged dictionary resulting from an explosion in a printing
shop!" ([22], p.15)
4. "...research has tended to widen rather than to narrow the gap that
exists between organic and inorganic matter." ([4], p.373)
5. "The Law of biogenesis...declares that life must come from life but
evolutionists ignore the law by stating that sometime in the past
during, supposedly, the early history of the earth, there were
processes and conditions that allowed for life to originate from
non-life. This, of course, is unproven and an unprovable assumption."
([22], p.14 5)
6. We find that the same elements that supposedly created life in the
beginning still exist today. Why can't they then produce life again?
([4], p.373)
7. The cell principle, excepted in Biology and all science, states that
all cells come from only pre-existing cells.
8. We certainly observe that life does not derive from non-life now.
9. Life is more than the sum of its parts. This may be why, at least in
part, science cannot define life. It can only give the characteristics
of living things.
10. Darwin wrote, "The first appearance of new beings...is a mystery of
mysteries."
11. All the matter we see, the sun and so forth, are said by evolutionists
to have begun by a mixture of gases in the atmosphere. But, from where
did the gases come and where did even the space for them come? Science
cannot account for something coming from nothing (and neither can
common sense account for it) and this is not to even mention the
complexity of matter which even adds to this absurdity. In fact, as
mentioned, when you have nothing, you do not even have the space for
the something that is to come from it.
12. In addition, without the sun, etc., there would be no gravity.
Therefore, those supposed gases from which all things supposedly come
would simply disseminate into space not draw together to form
anything.
13. Morality is generally accepted as a distinct characteristic of
humanity. This in itself creates an unbridgeable gap between people
and animals.
14. Famous evolutionist Roger Lewin proclaimed of the gap between people
and animals, "Our intelligence, our reflective consciousness, our
extreme technological facility, our complex spoken language, our sense
of moral and ethical values -- each of these is apparently sufficient
to set us apart from nature. Together they are seen to give us
`dominion over nature'. He adds that for evolutionists this gap is an
"embarrassment, something to be explained away." ([15], p.22)
15. Alfred Russell Wallace, considered to be the co-inventor with Darwin
of natural selection was said to have "Found this argument (natural
selection) convincing until he attempted to explain the advanced state
of human faculties." ([15], p.26)
16. Regarding people's intellectual powers and moral sense among other
things, Wallace also asserted that these "could not have been
developed by variation and natural selection alone, and..., therefore,
some other influence, law, or agency is required to account for them."
([11], p.310) He also concluded, "...a superior intelligence has
guided the development of man in a definite direction, and for a
special purpose." ([15], p.26)
17. Wallace along with famous evolutionist Robert Broom concluded "Divine
intervention was the only explanation for the origin of the qualities
that made Homo Sapiens so special." ([15], p.26)
18. Many evolutionists have tried to argue that humans are 99% similar
chemically to apes and blood precipitation tests do indicate that the
chimpanzee is people's closest relative. Yet regarding this we must
observe the following: "Milk chemistry indicates that the donkey is
man's closest relative." "Cholesterol level tests indicate that the
garter snake is man's closest relative." "Tear enzyme chemistry
indicates that the chicken is man's closest relative." "On the basis
of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter bean is man's
closest relative." ([19], p.362)
19. We find human's dominance over animals as utter and complete making a
common ancestry virtually impossible. Wallace and Broom asserted, "The
whole purpose, the only raison d'etre (reason for being) of the
world...was the development of the human spirit with the human body."
([15], p.26)
20. Broom asserted, "Much of evolution looks as if it had been planned to
result in man, and in other animals and plants to make the world a
suitable place for him to dwell in (and therefore)...the evolution of
man must have been planned by some spiritual power." ([14], p.42)
21. Regarding the 99% similarity chemically to apes figure, why is our
dominion over the apes so extensive if the 99% is so significant?
22. Perhaps Darwin would have abandoned his own theory had he realized
these three gaps in the order of living things. He stated, "I would
give nothing for the theory of natural selection, if it requires
miraculous additions at any one stage of descent." ([10], p.33)
Top 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Evolution Bias References
-------------
Last revised: Dec 29, 1995
Go to Creation Science home page