Monthly Archives: July 2008

Random movies, ’68 edition

More random movies, all of them from 1968, (why? why not?), which means they’re prefiltered by 40 years of film fans and are actually mostly interesting:

I Want Him Dead – Revenge themed spaghetti western. Crappy but fun, like most revenge flicks, (though not up to the Japanese classics).

Petulia – Some sort of sophisticated socialite sex comedy, interweaved with traumatic memories and a touch of sci-fi? Hm what? Watched: 12 minutes. IMDB reviewers say Petulia is underrated and misunderstood. Count me as a misunderstander.

Psych-Out – Haight-Ashbury exploitation, and Jack Nicholson with a ponytail. A lot of fun, but by the time it’s all over you’ll really, really hate hippies, (this may have been the purpose). IMDB reviewers say the hippie scene wasn’t like this at all. Aww.

Spider Baby – Plan 9-style intro speech and bad acting. Watched: 5 minutes, then fast forwarded through the rest. IMDB reviewers say it’s a self-parodic cult classic. Okay, but still.

The Night They Raided Minskys – Quick-witted comedy about a burlesque theatre in 1920′s New York, telling the urban legend version of how strip tease was invented, (by accident, your honor, I swear!) Works when the plot steps aside.

Danger: Diabolik – Italian crime movie where the hero is some sort of Batman supervillain who dresses like a ninja. And he’s a political radical too. Absolutely awesome. IMDB reviewers say it’s based on a comic book, which makes sense.

I took what others would have taken

Being a fantasy author is a good background for writing historical fiction. The past is an alien world, and the temptation is to fill it with people just like you and me. Michael Moorcock avoids this in Byzantium Endures, the first of four novels about the life of Pyat, a Russian engineer, in the first half of the 20th century. Born on January 1, 1900, Pyat is headed for hard times, and Byzantium Endures takes him from his childhood in the Ukraine to the end of the Russian civil war. Pyat is a resentful man, often mean-spirited, and an anti-semite. He is in his own view a brilliant engineer of unrecognized genius, far ahead of his time, but he’s not a reliable narrator, (he claims he built a flying machine at age 13, and later a ray gun that almost worked), so his actual abilities are a mystery for the reader. Pyat is sympathetic to the proto-fascist futurist movement, he believes in science, technology and reason, but also in tsarist Russia and the Orthodox Church. He hates the Jews and Bolsheviks for destroying the world he was promised, and the story is often interrupted by rants about Orthodox Russia’s rightful place in history. Like George MacDonald Fraser’s Flashman, the greatest scoundrel and coward in the British empire, Pyat is the ugly past in its own angry words, half revolting and half sympathetic, but unlike the Flashman novels, this isn’t comedy. How could it be?

My name is .. and I’m a book addict

Nick Carr’s essay on the danger web technology poses to the ability to concentrate on long texts has spawned two interesting discussions, one at Britannica’s blog and another at Edge. This is an important discussion, not because Carr or anyone else has found the answer, but because it’s time for us to think about what web culture is doing to us – or rather, how we would like to use these new tools. For we have a choice. If the web causes us to read fewer books like Carr warns, and even to think in twitter-sized chunks, I think that’s a bad thing, but it’s not inevitable. Once you become aware of where the technology is pushing you, you have a choice of going along or pushing back. For my part, I read more books than ever these days, but I haven’t always. The ability to read books doesn’t come for free, it’s not something a lucky few are granted, it can be trained, or neglected. The world is changing, far more than most people realize, and you need to ask yourself what kind of person you want to be in this new world. Do you want to be a book-reader? There are good alternatives, all I ask is that you choose consciously, and not just float along wherever the river takes you.

Den onde hyrde

Jens Bjørneboe skriver godt. Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor dette overrasker meg, for jeg har lest en del av essayene hans, men jeg hadde kanskje ventet meg mer polemikk og mindre romankunst. Den onde hyrde (1960) er ikke polemikk, det er satire, av den typen du ikke ler av. I våre dager er det politisk korrekt å klage på snillisme i fengselsvesenet, men alle reformer til tross kommer jeg aldri til å føle meg vel med innesperring som straffemetode. I beste fall kan jeg føle at noen fortjener det, men ikke at det gir mening på noe høyere nivå enn å holde forbryterne vekke fra ofrene sine en stund. Jeg vet ikke om noe alternativ, men liker det gjør jeg ikke. Det blir ikke bedre av at vi deler ut de strengeste straffene for handlinger som knapt burde vært forbudt. Jeg tror at den dagen ettertiden skal dømme oss – for det skal de, slik vi dømmer våre forgjengere – så er det narkokrigen de vil ta oss på. De vil kalle det en av de store statlige forbrytelsene i vår tid, og de av oss som fremdeles er i live vil ha lite å si til vårt forsvar, for ikke gjorde vi noe og ikke sa vi noe, vi bare lot det skje. Narkotika er ikke et tema i Den onde hyrde, men det er noe jeg vil du skal ha i tankene når du leser den, i tilfelle du føler deg fristet til å tenke at heldigvis er alt så mye bedre nå.

Zooty! Zoot Zoot!

My favourite libertarian skeptics, Penn & Teller, are back with a sixth season of Bullshit on Showtime. In line with my finger argument, Penn & Teller make anger and personal attacks a central part of their exposes of supernatural and puritanical beliefs. The tone is mocking, and will certainly alienate those who sympathize with the victims, but that doesn’t bother me as much as it once would have. There’s a time for having a calm and rational argument on whatever common ground you have with the other side, and there’s a time for rudely demonstrating how little common ground you actually have, as when in the recent episode on internet pornography and those who’d ban it they don’t argue that it’s beneficial or harmless, but rather that there’s no proof that it’s dangerous, so let’s just go with what’s fun, (an argument they then underline with plenty of nudity). Like all libertarians Penn & Teller have their cranky ideas, (climate skepticism is a popular one), but “being right all the time” is a silly standard for pundits and documentarists – I’d rather take smart, witty and interesting. Other themes this season: new age medicine, NASA, sleep and .. uh, dolphin superpowers? What?!

The Mind of God _is_ Cosmic Music Resonating Through 11-dimensional Hyperspace

A couple of songs I’m humming on these days:

Avalost by Seabound, from No Sleep Demon v2. Sorry about the cellphone quality, this song deserves better. (Here’s Transformer, another good song from the same album.)

In the same vein, but more anthemy, Ritual Noise by Covenant, from Skyshaper.

And on a lighter note, Mind of God and Tune Up by Electric Universe, from Silence In Action.

Twins, doubles, twins and doubles

Alternate history is a branch of science fiction, where the science in question is history, and for all its linchpin corniness I like it. (Btw I wonder if Robert Silverberg’s 2000 short story A Hero of the Empire, where Muhammed is killed to prevent the rise of Islam, could have been published today – in fact, forget I even mentioned it: look over there instead, my hypothetical Islamist readers, please leave mr Silverberg alone!) In The Separation, Christopher Priest weaves two histories together, one where Britain and Germany signed a peace treaty in 1941, and the other, our own, where they didn’t. A pair of identical twins are central to the story and to the mystery of the histories’ relationship to each other. This twin-theme and much more will be familiar to people who enjoyed The Prestige, another Priest novel, which was made into a wonderful movie. There’s the same sense that you’re only gradually being told what kind of story it is you’re reading. This trick is easier to pull off in short stories, but Priest manages it here, and he does it by changing the ground beneath you gradually, while you’re reading, instead of with a burst of twists at the end. It’s all very elegant and I liked it, (Philip K. Dick was good at this as well, although also extremely weird, which Priest isn’t, (Dick’s later plots generally revolve around drug-abusing schizophrenics, which gets tiresome after ten times or so)). I’ll read more of Priest. (He’s also a funny guy.)

The five-minute movie test

I like to watch the first five minutes of randomly downloaded movies. Find ten movies I haven’t heard of, see the beginning of each, and usually one of them will be worth watching to the end. The discovery is more enjoyable for it being random, the movie becomes your own in a sense a “you have to see this!” movie never can. You also get to appreciate the movie on its own terms, not knowing any plot points in advance. I found Altered States this way, a real gem. Of course, most of these movies are shit, but even the bad ones are interesting as little glimpses into the backstreets of movie history. Today’s movie: Lawman (1971), which I did give up on after 5 minutes, (it opens with a generic Western brawl and a stranger riding into town, so I figured I could save myself some time and just imagine the rest), but then I found some positive reviews and decided to give it a second chance. Glad I did, it’s a fine western, just the way I like them. And now I have five more unknown movies to try out next. (Yes, I do buy the good ones.)

Is this rehash really necessary? Yes it is

The Sandbaggers is one of the most brilliant television series I’ve seen, so it was something of an experience to open up Queen & Country, a comic book bought on random, and find an exact replica of the premise for Ian Mackintosh’s 1978-1980 series. The homage is deliberate, and although I am tempted to reprimand Greg Rucka for stealing The Sandbaggers, merely filling it with different characters and moving it up to our own time, I am so in love with The Sandbaggers that I am really just happy to have it all back. Mackintosh’s brilliance was to create a realistic spy series with emphasis on the bureaucratic infighting back home, (which shouldn’t work but it did), and Greg Rucka has updated this beautifully, replacing the Cold War-plots with similarly styled stories of his own, (interestingly, terrorism is a major factor in both versions). Rucka follows, and never surpasses the old master, (who disappeared and supposedly died in an airplane accident in 1979, but personally I believe he was taken by aliens), but he breathes enough fresh air into it to make it worthwile. And Queen & Country is far better than the third season of The Sandbaggers, which was filmed after Mackintosh’s death and partly written by others, (the fact that the he managed to write four episodes after his own “death” certainly lends credibility to my alien abduction theory, now doesn’t it?)

There’s a feeling I get when I look to the east

The Fountains of Paradise by Arthur C. Clarke reads at times like the space travel scenes in 2001: A Space Odyssey: calm and majestic. This is hard SF in the purer sense, science fiction with an emphasis on the wonders of almost-possible technology, and not much on anything else. Crises are resolved in a rational manner, and with correspondingly calm language. On one hand it reassures the reader to know that the author isn’t just randomly pulling our hearstrings, that things happen for reasons that go beyond “ooh, time for another race against the clock, now who can I place in jeopardy next?” Doesn’t make for a very interesting novel though. The Fountains of Paradise is a wonderful concept sketch of the space elevator, one of the more awe-inspiring solutions to launching people into space. And it’s not a bad novel, Clarke is a great writer, and some might find this minimalism refreshing, (it did get the Hugo and Nebula awards), but to me it’s all just too .. respectable. The opening, with its parallels between an ancient king of a Sri Lankaesque island who builds a mountain palace to bring Heaven to Earth, and a 22nd century engineer’s dream of a space elevator in the same area, made me expect something bold along the lines of “The 9 billion names of God”, but the religious themes are quickly resolved and set aside, to give way for scientific awe with some drama attached. That said, this could make an awesome movie.