More random movies, all of them from 1968, (why? why not?), which means they’re prefiltered by 40 years of film fans and are actually mostly interesting:
I Want Him Dead – Revenge themed spaghetti western. Crappy but fun, like most revenge flicks, (though not up to the Japanese classics).
Petulia – Some sort of sophisticated socialite sex comedy, interweaved with traumatic memories and a touch of sci-fi? Hm what? Watched: 12 minutes. IMDB reviewers say Petulia is underrated and misunderstood. Count me as a misunderstander.
Psych-Out – Haight-Ashbury exploitation, and Jack Nicholson with a ponytail. A lot of fun, but by the time it’s all over you’ll really, really hate hippies, (this may have been the purpose). IMDB reviewers say the hippie scene wasn’t like this at all. Aww.
Spider Baby – Plan 9-style intro speech and bad acting. Watched: 5 minutes, then fast forwarded through the rest. IMDB reviewers say it’s a self-parodic cult classic. Okay, but still.
The Night They Raided Minskys – Quick-witted comedy about a burlesque theatre in 1920′s New York, telling the urban legend version of how strip tease was invented, (by accident, your honor, I swear!) Works when the plot steps aside.
Danger: Diabolik – Italian crime movie where the hero is some sort of Batman supervillain who dresses like a ninja. And he’s a political radical too. Absolutely awesome. IMDB reviewers say it’s based on a comic book, which makes sense.
Being a fantasy author is a good background for writing historical fiction. The past is an alien world, and the temptation is to fill it with people just like you and me. Michael Moorcock avoids this in Byzantium Endures, the first of four novels about the life of Pyat, a Russian engineer, in the first half of the 20th century. Born on January 1, 1900, Pyat is headed for hard times, and Byzantium Endures takes him from his childhood in the Ukraine to the end of the Russian civil war. Pyat is a resentful man, often mean-spirited, and an anti-semite. He is in his own view a brilliant engineer of unrecognized genius, far ahead of his time, but he’s not a reliable narrator, (he claims he built a flying machine at age 13, and later a ray gun that almost worked), so his actual abilities are a mystery for the reader. Pyat is sympathetic to the proto-fascist futurist movement, he believes in science, technology and reason, but also in tsarist Russia and the Orthodox Church. He hates the Jews and Bolsheviks for destroying the world he was promised, and the story is often interrupted by rants about Orthodox Russia’s rightful place in history. Like George MacDonald Fraser’s Flashman, the greatest scoundrel and coward in the British empire, Pyat is the ugly past in its own angry words, half revolting and half sympathetic, but unlike the Flashman novels, this isn’t comedy. How could it be?
Jens Bjørneboe skriver godt. Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor dette overrasker meg, for jeg har lest en del av essayene hans, men jeg hadde kanskje ventet meg mer polemikk og mindre romankunst. Den onde hyrde (1960) er ikke polemikk, det er satire, av den typen du ikke ler av. I våre dager er det politisk korrekt å klage på snillisme i fengselsvesenet, men alle reformer til tross kommer jeg aldri til å føle meg vel med innesperring som straffemetode. I beste fall kan jeg føle at noen fortjener det, men ikke at det gir mening på noe høyere nivå enn å holde forbryterne vekke fra ofrene sine en stund. Jeg vet ikke om noe alternativ, men liker det gjør jeg ikke. Det blir ikke bedre av at vi deler ut de strengeste straffene for handlinger som knapt burde vært forbudt. Jeg tror at den dagen ettertiden skal dømme oss – for det skal de, slik vi dømmer våre forgjengere – så er det narkokrigen de vil ta oss på. De vil kalle det en av de store statlige forbrytelsene i vår tid, og de av oss som fremdeles er i live vil ha lite å si til vårt forsvar, for ikke gjorde vi noe og ikke sa vi noe, vi bare lot det skje. Narkotika er ikke et tema i Den onde hyrde, men det er noe jeg vil du skal ha i tankene når du leser den, i tilfelle du føler deg fristet til å tenke at heldigvis er alt så mye bedre nå.
My favourite libertarian skeptics, Penn & Teller, are back with a sixth season of Bullshit on Showtime. In line with my
Alternate history is a branch of science fiction, where the science in question is history, and for all its linchpin corniness I like it. (Btw I wonder if Robert Silverberg’s 2000 short story A Hero of the Empire, where Muhammed is killed to prevent the rise of Islam, could have been published today – in fact, forget I even mentioned it: look over there instead, my hypothetical Islamist readers, please leave mr Silverberg alone!) In The Separation, Christopher Priest weaves two histories together, one where Britain and Germany signed a peace treaty in 1941, and the other, our own, where they didn’t. A pair of identical twins are central to the story and to the mystery of the histories’ relationship to each other. This twin-theme and much more will be familiar to people who enjoyed The Prestige, another Priest novel, which was made into a wonderful movie. There’s the same sense that you’re only gradually being told what kind of story it is you’re reading. This trick is easier to pull off in short stories, but Priest manages it here, and he does it by changing the ground beneath you gradually, while you’re reading, instead of with a burst of twists at the end. It’s all very elegant and I liked it, (Philip K. Dick was good at this as well, although also extremely weird, which Priest isn’t, (Dick’s later plots generally revolve around drug-abusing schizophrenics, which gets tiresome after ten times or so)). I’ll read more of Priest. (He’s also a 
The Fountains of Paradise by Arthur C. Clarke reads at times like the space travel scenes in 2001: A Space Odyssey: calm and majestic. This is hard SF in the purer sense, science fiction with an emphasis on the wonders of almost-possible technology, and not much on anything else. Crises are resolved in a rational manner, and with correspondingly calm language. On one hand it reassures the reader to know that the author isn’t just randomly pulling our hearstrings, that things happen for reasons that go beyond “ooh, time for another race against the clock, now who can I place in jeopardy next?” Doesn’t make for a very interesting novel though. The Fountains of Paradise is a wonderful concept sketch of the